Dutch Supreme Court Confirms CJEU Decision in Fiscal Unity Cases

; posted on
October 23rd, 2018

The Dutch Supreme Court issued decisions in case no.15/00194 and no. 15/00878 related to interest deduction limitation and the (non-) deductibility of currency losses on certain participations. The issues for both cases were whether the Dutch tax law (i.e., fiscal unity) is compatible with the freedom of establishment.

Interest Deduction Limitation to Prevent Base Erosion

This case is about a parent company established in a Member State that is not allowed to deduct interest in respect of a loan taken out with a related company to finance a capital contribution to a subsidiary established in another Member State, whereas if the subsidiary was established in the same Member State, the parent company could avail itself of that deduction by forming a fiscal unity.

With reference to the CJEU’s conclusions, the Supreme Court concluded that the application of the interest deduction limitation, in light of the beneficial effect of a fiscal unity in purely domestic situations, infringes the freedom of establishment and cannot be justified. Therefore, Section 10a CITA (interest deduction limitation rule to prevent base erosion) must be disregarded in the present case. Besides, the Supreme Court also noted that comparison does not have to be made with the hypothetical situation in which there is a cross-border fiscal unity.

Currency Losses on Participations in EU Subsidiary

The second case concerned the impossibility to deduct a currency loss suffered by a Dutch parent company on a subsidiary residing in the EU under the Dutch participation exemption if the parent company and the subsidiary would have been included in a fiscal unity, a currency loss related to the assets of the consolidated subsidiary would have been deductible. However, the fiscal unity regime only applies to Dutch resident subsidiaries. Therefore, the non-deductible currency loss could not be avoided even though the subsidiary is included as fiscal unity.

In response to the case, the Supreme Court, aligned with CJEU judgment, concluded that there is no infringement of the freedom of establishment and is presented based on a symmetry argument: under Dutch law both currency losses and currency profits are not taken into account. A Dutch company will normally not incur a currency loss on participation in a Dutch subsidiary unless that shareholding is denominated in another currency than the profits of the parent company.  

Response of the Dutch Ministry of Finance

Regarding the cases mentioned earlier, the Dutch Ministry of Finance published a legislative proposal that contains measures to bring the fiscal unity regime in line with the per-element approach taken by the CJEU and under which several provisions in the CITA and the dividend withholding tax would be applied ignoring the existence of fiscal unity. Once both houses of parliament approved the proposed bill, the measures will apply retroactively as from 1 January 2018.

Sources: Case number 15/00194, Case number 15/00878

Workshop For Corporates - "Fit For Future: A Refined Approach To Tax Risk Management"

This workshop will not only provide insights into the latest national and international developments in the field of analytics applied by governments, but will also allow for sufficient dialogue amongst participants and presenters alike to share best practices around designing a Tax Risk Management Strategy going forward.

How to manage Global Tax Controversy?
How to use Value Chain Analysis as a risk management tool?
How to Use Tax Technology to stay one step ahead of the tax authorities?

Tuesday 31 January, 2019

Time: 9.00AM - 6.30PM   London (UK)
Venue: De Vere Grand Connaught Rooms, London

Copyright © 2018
Transfer Pricing Associates BV.
All rights reserved.
 

H.J.E. Wenckebachweg 210
1096 AS Amsterdam
T: +31 20 462 3530
E: info@tpa-global.com
I: www.tpa-global.com